eVA Vehicle Appraisal

The eVA app is a comprehensive vehicle valuation and appraisal platform designed to enhance the vehicle transaction experience for retailers, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), and fleets. It is a SaaS product, providing cloud-based software tools for vehicle valuation and appraisal, which automotive dealers can access via the internet. It facilitates accurate vehicle valuations, streamlines part-exchange processes, and offers flexible options for vehicle disposal, including direct purchase or auctioning. The app supports various account levels, allowing dealerships to assign roles such as sales managers, appraisers, and auction coordinators, each with tailored access and functionalities.

Aim

Redesign the eVA Web App

Duration

12 months

Client

Cox Automotive – Enterprise

Role

UX Designer

Tools

Mural, Hotjar, Dovetail, Userlytics, Figma

Redesigned Product

Final Prototypes

Original Product

Final Prototypes
Discovery Phase
User Understanding
Design Ideation
User Testing
Final Product

Discovery Phase

The Problem

As a UX Designer, working closely with Product Managers, I set out to deeply understand the vehicle appraisal process used by dealers and contribute to shaping the digital strategy for eVA. Our goal was to identify how the existing platform supports users, uncover their pain points, and determine what they need from a digital inspection tool moving forward.

Research Goals

  • Understand the current vehicle appraisal workflow
  • Identify pain points in the existing platform
  • Define user needs for a digital inspection tool
  • Map the competitive landscape

To ensure a user-centred redesign, I conducted a comprehensive research process, combining internal assessments, behavioural analytics, user feedback, field observations, competitor analysis, and usability testing. From this combination, we identified the following key findings:

Navigation & Interface Issues

  • Critical actions hidden in the hamburger menu
  • Lack of progress indicators and confusing back button
  • Accessibility issues (contrast violations) fail WCAG standards

Operational Workflow Inefficiencies

  • Vehicle inspection sequence did not align with real-world practices
  • No option to save progress
  • Complex system integration and manual data entry

Knowledge & Training Gaps

  • Lack of embedded expertise and a common appraisal framework
  • Industry jargon created barriers
  • Steep learning curve for new users due to poor onboarding

Environmental & Performance Challenges

  • External factors (weather, lighting) impacted inspection quality & caused frustration
  • System errors reduced efficiency and appraisal accuracy

These findings formed the foundation for the redesign strategy. Through this research, I aimed to inform key improvements and recommendations to streamline the process, enhance user satisfaction, and optimise the vehicle appraisal experience. By addressing these challenges, we sought to create a solution that not only improves efficiency but also better supports dealers and their businesses.

Research Methodology

How might we create a more intuitive and efficient vehicle appraisal platform that addresses dealers' pain points while improving the overall inspection experience?

Internal Evaluation: Heuristic & Accessibility Assessment

The research started with a heuristic evaluation and accessibility audit, revealing usability issues in the appraisal process, including hidden actions, poor visibility, and inefficient navigation. Key problems were a confusing action sequence, ambiguous buttons, no data loss safeguards, poor colour contrast and misleading colour hierarchy (primary colour matched the success colour, confusing actions and feedback).

Behavioural Analysis: Hotjar Insights & Surveys

To gain quantitative and qualitative insights, I leveraged Hotjar to track user interactions with the app. This analysis helped uncover usability patterns, friction points, and areas of confusion.

Hotjar screenshots showing user behavior

Additionally, I conducted in-app surveys to measure user satisfaction and Net Promoter Score (NPS). The results revealed an NPS score of -26, indicating significant user dissatisfaction and a clear need for a substantial redesign to address these concerns.

Survey results showing user satisfaction

External Research: Workshops & Stakeholder Interviews

To further explore user needs, I conducted research workshops that included small-scale observational studies with inspectors at auction centres and dealerships to understand how they interact with the app in real-world settings.

I also conducted remote interviews with key stakeholders, including product managers, customer support teams, and sales representatives, to align the redesign with business objectives, priorities, and the long-term vision for the product.

Photos from dealership visits and observations

Following this research, I first organised the data into an affinity map to identify relationships and group similar insights. Then, I coded recurring patterns across user behaviours, pain points, and business priorities.

Photo of affinity map
Photo of codes

This process revealed the following insights:

Thematic Analysis Results

Competitive Analysis

In parallel, I performed a competitor analysis to benchmark market positioning and industry standards. This helped assess how competitors handle similar challenges and provided inspiration for potential improvements in usability, features, and design patterns.

Competitive analysis table

Usability Testing

Finally, I conducted usability testing using Userlytics with five participants - dealers who had never used our app before. The objective was to assess how easily they could complete fundamental tasks and identify usability friction points.

Screenshots from remote usability testing sessions

Participants were asked to complete one overarching scenario with specific tasks, including initiating valuations, searching for vehicle information, and accessing previous appraisals. Throughout the test, participants provided real-time feedback, highlighting confusion points, usability issues, and potential improvements.

Our usability testing revealed several key areas for improvement that were affecting the user experience. These findings guided our redesign priorities and helped us address the most significant user challenges.

Language Clarity

Unclear labels and industry jargon without explanations caused confusion, making it difficult for users to complete basic tasks.

Visual Design and Affordance

Poor design patterns, including a limited search bar, checkboxes for non-interactive elements, and misused hamburger menu for actions.

Information Architecture

Users struggle to track their journey, with critical actions hidden in menus. Key actions are unevenly placed, making some easy to find, while others are harder to access.

Addressing these critical pain points became central to our redesign strategy, forming the foundation for significant improvements in the user experience.

User Understanding and Journey

Personas

Based on the research insights, I created detailed personas representing key user groups who engage with the eVA platform. These personas helped us better understand the needs, goals, frustrations, and behaviors of the users, guiding the design process to address their specific pain points.

User Personas for the eVA platform

Empathy Map

To dive deeper into understanding the users' motivations and emotional responses, we turned to the Empathy Map. This allowed us to visualise and synthesise what we learned about our users in a more human-centred way.

Empathy Map showing user feelings and thoughts

User Journey

The user journey map was a critical tool to visualise how users interact with the app at each step of the process. From initiating a valuation to finalising the transaction, the journey highlighted pain points, including confusing navigation paths and lack of progress indicators.

User Journey Map

We held a collaborative brainstorming session to identify key opportunities for enhancing the user experience. This session allowed us to pinpoint pain points, uncover unmet needs, and explore innovative solutions to streamline the appraisal process.

Brainstorming session photos

Design Ideation

Component Library: Solving Inconsistency Issues

One of the critical issues identified during research was the inconsistent use of UI components throughout the application, creating several problems:

Misused Components

Components like tabs were being used for different purposes across the application, creating confusion about their function.

Mixed Mental Models

Inconsistency forced users to learn different mental models for the same visual elements, increasing cognitive load.

Fragmented Experience

The product felt cobbled together from different systems rather than providing a cohesive experience.

Creating a Comprehensive UI Component Library

To address these issues, I developed a structured UI component library that established clear standards and patterns:

UI Component Library showing standardised elements

Standardisation Approach

  • Defined clear component purposes
  • Standardised interaction patterns
  • Established visual consistency
  • Created comprehensive documentation

Measurable Impact

85%

Reduction in inconsistent usage

40%

Decrease in design decision time

This design approach improved task completion, reduced errors, and ensured consistency in product identity and accessibility. I then created interactive Figma prototypes to simulate the vehicle appraisal process, helping validate the design before development.

User Testing

I conducted usability testing with 5 users on both the original and redesigned versions to compare task completion, identify improvements, and validate design decisions.

45%

Task completion rate

35%

Time on task

60%

Error Rate

45%

User Satisfaction

Final Product

Dashboard: Before

Original Dashboard
  • Basic search interface
  • Minimal context
  • No actionable insights

Dashboard: After

Redesigned Dashboard
  • Data-rich dashboard
  • Immediate insights
  • Empowering user experience

Past Valuations: Before

Original Past Valuation Screen
  • Cluttered layout
  • Limited information visibility
  • No clear action paths

Past Valuations: After

Redesigned Past Valuations Screen
  • Structured tabular design
  • Vehicle thumbnails
  • Easy filtering
  • Logical action placement

Valuation Details: Before

Original Valuation Details
  • Poor visual hierarchy
  • Confusing layout
  • Misleading interactions (checkboxes that look clickable)

Valuation Details: After

Redesigned Valuation Details
  • Side-modal design that maintains user context
  • Progressive information disclosure
  • Improved readability

Appraisal Process: Before

Original Valuation Details
  • Restrictive dropdown workflow limited damage reporting flexibility
  • Unclear labels, binary choices, and no visuals made inspections confusing
  • Didn't accommodate user expertise levels, frustrating all inspectors
  • Inspection sequence misaligned with natural vehicle examination, causing inefficiency

Appraisal Process: After

Original Valuation Details
  • Dual modes (guided workflow for novices, quick diagrams for experts) suit all skill levels
  • Allows users to report multiple damages
  • Follows natural inspection flow, using clear visuals and progressive disclosure
  • The visual approach reduces cognitive load and makes the inspection process more engaging

Vehicle Summary: Before

Original Menu Design
  • Dense, unfiltered content causes cognitive fatigue
  • Poor Scannability, long lists with minimal hierarchy make it hard to find relevant details quickly
  • No filtering forces users to scroll through details
  • Relying only on text makes it harder to understand the vehicle's condition

Vehicle Summary: After

Redesigned Menu
  • Option to only see questions where the user’s answer differs from the default, reducing cognitive load
  • Better spacing, alignment, and organization make scanning easier
  • Car diagram with marked damage provides an intuitive and quick way to assess condition

Navigation Menu: Before

Original Menu Design
  • Complex structure
  • Hidden actions
  • Unclear navigation

Navigation Menu: After

Redesigned Menu
  • Simplified menu
  • Clear action hierarchy
  • Reduced cognitive load

The eVA Vehicle Appraisal redesign transformed a flawed platform into an intuitive solution by addressing key pain points through research. By focusing on user-centered design, including clearer navigation, visual damage reporting, contextual info, and customisable workflows, the redesign improved task speed, reduced errors, and increased satisfaction. It shows how thoughtful UX can meet business needs while simplifying daily operations for users.

In technical fields, diagrams and visual representations reduce cognitive load dramatically compared to text-heavy interfaces. One clear image can replace paragraphs of explanation.

The difference between a struggling product and a successful one often isn't flashy features - it's understanding the genuine human experience of users in their actual environment.

Contact

Let's have a talk so you can learn more about my work!

© Copyright   Ioanna Lazaridou | All rights reserved.